51茶馆

On November 10th, the Boisi Center hosted a luncheon colloquium featuring R. Ward Holder, discussing 鈥淩ace, Theology, and Pedagogy: Conversations between Africans and Americans.鈥� Holder is a political and historical theologian currently teaching at St. Anselm College. Last spring he organized and taught a collaborative course on race and theology with students at St. Anselm and students at Tumaini University Makumira, in Usa River, Tanzania. Through the course, he was able to compile significant insights regarding pedagogy and the effects of international dialogue on an important topic: black theology.

Holder began by outlining the several events in 2020 that stirred up a major reckoning about race in America鈥攏otably, the deaths of Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and George Floyd, in addition to the mass demonstrations that followed. Inspired by this action, Holder realized that there was a major gap in the course offerings at St. Anselm: none engaged race and theology directly. He decided to create one, in partnership with his sister, Professor Cynthia Holder-Rich, a missionary teacher in Tanzania. Professors Holder and Holder-Rich set out to create a Zoom course that would allow students at two separate universities and from two different continents to connect and learn together.

The course, entitled Race and Theology, was an undergraduate course offering at St. Anselm that fulfilled the required theology credit. At Tumaini, it was an extracurricular reading group open to undergraduate and graduate students, resulting in an older group of students. Together, these groups met regularly to listen to guest speakers, have group discussions on common readings, and place their theological studies in the context of race in the world.

While teaching the course, Holder also collaborated with education specialist Aubrey Scheopner Torres to conduct a qualitative research project on the students鈥� learning process in this unfamiliar context.

There were some challenges with the course, as is to be expected for the first round of such an undertaking. The time zone difference made it difficult to schedule meetings between the classes, and the Tanzanian academic calendar does not line up with the American one. Perhaps most importantly, access to electricity, the internet, and computers was significantly limited for the Tanzanian students, though Holder remarked that this obstacle actually helped American students to contextualize daily life for their conversation partners. Holder also acknowledged the structural issues of the research project, in that all of the researchers were European American.

The benefits of the project, however, outweighed the challenges. The St. Anselm students made significant connections between race and theology that they had never before been asked to consider. The Tumaini students were excited about the opportunity to be invited into a dialogue about their experiences of race, and noted that they appreciated the ability to speak freely about sensitive topics. Both groups responded well to speaking with each other and with the guest lecturers, and they consistently requested more opportunities for dialogue.

The major conclusion drawn from the project was that the students overwhelmingly appreciated and benefited from the time to speak with each other and consider their course topics in collaboration. Providing a space for dialogue was crucial. Prior to beginning the course, Holder had not expected the degree of importance this would take, imagining perhaps that the guest lecturers or assigned readings might hold more weight.

Holder ended his presentation by considering the future implications of the course. He acknowledged the difficulty of making connections with teachers and administrators at foreign universities, now that his sister, Holder-Rich, is no longer working in Tanzania. Further, he posited new possibilities for the course structure such as partnering with American H51茶馆Us or re-imagining the content for a Latinx community.

Questions from the audience included how to decenter whiteness and authority when the professor is white teaching about Black theology, whether Zoom provided opportunities for more or less honesty and vulnerability in participants, whether the conversations around race and colonialism would have been different if St. Anselm was not comprised of predominantly white students, and whether there would be any future impact on the curriculum at St. Anselm based on the results of the course.
听